How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. AMIRON 300 vs Ultra Open Earbuds

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300 vs Bose Ultra Open Earbuds

What AMIRON 300 does better (4) and where Ultra Open Earbuds wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic AMIRON 300
beyerdynamic · 2024AMIRON 300
7.9Score
4 advantages≈ $180
Higher score
vs
Bose Ultra Open Earbuds
Bose · 2024Ultra Open Earbuds
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ $190
8.4Noise control & calls4.6
7.2Battery4.8

Why is AMIRON 300 better than Ultra Open Earbuds?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · Ultra Open Earbuds: No
  2. Battery life10 h vs 7 h+43%
  3. Total with charging case40 h vs 27 h+48%
  4. LDACYes · Ultra Open Earbuds: No

Why is Ultra Open Earbuds better than AMIRON 300?

  1. Charging time2 h vs 1 h2×
  2. aptXNo · AMIRON 300: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Impedance32 Ω—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones6—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h7 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case40 h27 h
Charging time2 h1 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCaptX Adaptive, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoYes
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.4 g—
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare