vs
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
8.0Battery6.9
Why is Amiron 200 better than OpenWear Stereo Pro?
- Battery life11 h vs 8 h+38%
Why is OpenWear Stereo Pro better than Amiron 200?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Amiron 200: Yes
- Total with charging case36 h vs 45 h+25%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · Amiron 200: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Number of drivers | — | 4 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Head tracking | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | 8 h |
| Total with charging case | 36 h | 45 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 56 mAh |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 72 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Beats Powerbeats Fitvsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2005.85.6vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 300vsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2008.05.6vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 1005.66.3vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier A6vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier Comfo Flex