vs
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
Why is Amiron 200 better than Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer?
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer better than Amiron 200?
- Battery life11 h vs 30 h2.7×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | 30 h |
| Total with charging case | 36 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | — | Grey, White |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Beats Powerbeats Fitvsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2005.85.6
vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 300vsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2008.05.6vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 1005.66.3vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier Comfo Flexvs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier A6
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer