Why is HC 200 better than HPBT010?
- Driver size57 mm vs 40 mm+43%
Why is HPBT010 better than HC 200?
HPBT010 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 57 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 85 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 4 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5 |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 157 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
