Why is HPBT010 better than TAH2005BK?
- Weight157 g vs 185 g+18%
- Driver size40 mm vs 32 mm+25%
Why is TAH2005BK better than HPBT010?
TAH2005BK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 32 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 85 dB | 80 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 157 g | 185 g |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
