Why is Bowie WM01 better than HA-A11T?
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5.1+4%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 5.2 g+24%
Why is HA-A11T better than Bowie WM01?
HA-A11T has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 5.8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 8 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | 5.2 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
