vs
2.2Battery9.7
Why is Cisco 950 better than earU ER-100PT?
Cisco 950 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is earU ER-100PT better than Cisco 950?
- Battery life5 h vs 14 h2.8×
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 14 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 8 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
