How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BeoSound A9 Mk5 vs Fidelio TAFA3/10

Bang & Olufsen BeoSound A9 Mk5 vs Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10

What BeoSound A9 Mk5 does better (2) and where Fidelio TAFA3/10 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Bang & Olufsen BeoSound A9 Mk5
Bang & Olufsen · 2023BeoSound A9 Mk5
8.8Score
2 advantages≈ $3,500
vs
Philips Fidelio TAFA3/10
Philips · 2026Fidelio TAFA3/10
9.5Score
5 advantages
Higher score
9.7Sound9.7
3.0Connectivity8.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

BeoSound A9 Mk5Fidelio TAFA3/10
701 × 908415170 × 303211
BeoSound A9 Mk5Fidelio TAFA3/10Difference
Height908 mm303 mm+605 mm
Width701 mm170 mm+531 mm
Depth415 mm211 mm+204 mm
Weight14,000 g3,399 g+10,601 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BeoSound A9 Mk5 better than Fidelio TAFA3/10?

  1. Output power1,100 W vs 100 W11×
  2. Lowest frequency33 Hz vs 40 Hz+21%

Why is Fidelio TAFA3/10 better than BeoSound A9 Mk5?

  1. Weight14,000 g vs 3,399 g4.1×
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · BeoSound A9 Mk5: Yes
  3. Bluetooth version4.2 vs 5.4+29%
  4. LDACNo · BeoSound A9 Mk5: Yes
  5. Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+60%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power1,100 W100 W
Lowest frequency33 Hz40 Hz
Highest frequency25,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Battery & charging
Mains poweredYesNo
Battery powered (portable)NoNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version4.25.4
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
LE Audio—Yes
Auracast—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Optical inputYesYes
EthernetYes—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast / Google CastYes—
Spotify ConnectYes—
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant—
Voice assistant built inYes—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight14,000 g3,399 g
Width701 mm170 mm
Height908 mm303 mm
Depth415 mm211 mm
Colours—Black
Features
Party / stereo pairingYes—
Remote control—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare