vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
4.9Battery9.3
3.0Build & features3.3
Why is TE-ZX1 better than GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T?
TE-ZX1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T better than TE-ZX1?
- Battery life8 h vs 14.5 h+81%
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
- Earbud weight (each)7.1 g vs 6.7 g+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Planar magnetic | MEMS |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 14.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 20 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.1 g | 6.7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsSamsung Galaxy Buds4 Pro8.08.4vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsSennheiser MOMENTUM True Wireless 58.07.7vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.07.9vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100SH-WY8.07.9
vsCambridge Audio Melomania A100vsKenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T7.88.0