vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
9.1Battery3.7
6.0Build & features4.8
Why is TE-Q3-NA2 better than EAH-AZ40M2?
- Battery life11.5 h vs 7 h+64%
- Total with charging case42 h vs 24 h+75%
- Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 5 g+19%
Why is EAH-AZ40M2 better than TE-Q3-NA2?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TE-Q3-NA2: Yes
- LDACNo · TE-Q3-NA2: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11.5 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | 42 h | 24 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Alexa |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | 5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
