vs
7.2Noise control & calls9.3
Why is TE-Q3-NA2 better than Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400?
TE-Q3-NA2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400 better than TE-Q3-NA2?
Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11.5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 42 h | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 60 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Bixby |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Soundcore Liberty 4 NCvsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400
vsHuawei FreeClipvsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400
vsTechnics EAH-AZ40M2vsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400
vsSony WF-C700NvsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vsJBL TOUR Pro 2
vsJBL Live FlexvsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400