vs
8.3Battery8.3
Why is TE-D01m better than FALCON Pro?
TE-D01m has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is FALCON Pro better than TE-D01m?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Hybrid |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 24,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 93 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 10 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 6 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
