Why is Hi-X65 better than EAH-A800?
Hi-X65 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is EAH-A800 better than Hi-X65?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Hi-X65: Yes
- Weight310 g vs 298 g+4%
- Highest frequency28,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+43%
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 4 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | — | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 28,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 25 Ω | 34 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | 105 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 60 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 50 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 310 g | 298 g |
| Colours | Black | — |
