vs
Why is Hi-X65 better than HE-R10 Dynamic Version?
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
- Weight310 g vs 337 g+9%
Why is HE-R10 Dynamic Version better than Hi-X65?
- Highest frequency28,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 50 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 28,000 Hz | 35,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 25 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | 100 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 10 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 310 g | 337 g |
| Colours | Black | — |
