vs
3.8Noise control & calls6.4
Why is Hi-X65 better than Aventho 300?
- Weight310 g vs 319 g+3%
- Highest frequency28,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+27%
Why is Aventho 300 better than Hi-X65?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Hi-X65: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 45 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 28,000 Hz | 22,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 25 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 50 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 50 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 310 g | 319 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
