Why is Hi-X25BT better than WH-XB910N?
- Driver size44 mm vs 40 mm+10%
Why is WH-XB910N better than Hi-X25BT?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Hi-X25BT: Yes
- Battery life30 h vs 50 h+67%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Hi-X25BT: Yes
- LDACNo · Hi-X25BT: Yes
- Weight270 g vs 252 g+7%
- Lowest frequency12 Hz vs 7 Hz+71%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
- Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 25,000 Hz+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 44 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 12 Hz | 7 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 24,000 Hz | 25,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 25 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 113 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 30 h | 50 h |
| Charging time | — | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 270 g | 252 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-M50xBT2vsAustrian Audio Hi-X25BTvs
Austrian Audio Hi-X25BTvsAudio Technica ATH-EP1000IR
vsbeyerdynamic DT 990 PRO Black EditionvsAustrian Audio Hi-X25BT
vsTeufel REAL Blue 2021vsAustrian Audio Hi-X25BTvs
Austrian Audio Hi-X25BTvsTeufel Supreme Onvs
Austrian Audio Hi-X25BTvsGrado SR125x