How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Hi-X25BT vs Crusher Evo

Austrian Audio Hi-X25BT vs Skullcandy Crusher Evo

What Hi-X25BT does better (4) and where Crusher Evo wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Austrian Audio Hi-X25BT
Austrian Audio · 2021Hi-X25BT
4 advantages≈ $150
vs
Skullcandy Crusher Evo
Skullcandy · 2020Crusher Evo
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ $120
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is Hi-X25BT better than Crusher Evo?

  1. Weight270 g vs 312 g+16%
  2. Lowest frequency12 Hz vs 20 Hz+67%
  3. Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+20%
  4. Driver size44 mm vs 40 mm+10%

Why is Crusher Evo better than Hi-X25BT?

  1. Battery life30 h vs 40 h+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size44 mm40 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency12 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency24,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance25 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity113 dB100 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life30 h40 h
Charging time—2.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 4 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsSBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight270 g312 g
FoldableYesYes
ColoursBlackTrue Black, Chill Grey, Primer, Realtree APX Black/Orange, Bone
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare