vs
Why is SB92S 2.1 Soundbar better than TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80W?
- Channel count4 vs 22×
Why is TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80W better than SB92S 2.1 Soundbar?
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | — | 160 W |
| Speaker channels | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| Channel count | 4 | 2 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 1,930 g |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Features | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Placement | an der Wand | an der Wand |
Related comparisons
vs
Majority Naga 40 PlusvsAudizio SB92S 2.1 Soundbar
vsOakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200WvsAudizio SB92S 2.1 Soundbarvs
Audizio SB92S 2.1 SoundbarvsSamsung HW-Q600H/XU
vsJBL Bar 800MK2 7.1-Kanal-SoundbarvsAudizio SB92S 2.1 Soundbar
vsPhilips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsOakcastle SB80 Xtra 2.1 Split-Soundbar 200WvsPhilips TAB5201 Soundbar 2.0 80WvsSamsung HW-Q600H/XU