vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
8.9Battery9.3
4.6Build & features3.2
Why is ATH-TWX9MK3 better than GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T?
- Battery life15 h vs 14.5 h+3%
- Earbud weight (each)5.1 g vs 6.7 g+31%
Why is GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100T better than ATH-TWX9MK3?
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 10 mm+72%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 1.5 h+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | MEMS |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 14.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 11 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, LHDC, LC3, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.1 g | 6.7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9MK2vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK36.28.4
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds4 ProvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK38.48.4
vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-OhrhörervsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK3
vsSoundcore R50i NCvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK3
vsBose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-EarbudsvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK3
vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.07.8