vs
7.2Noise control & calls3.1
Why is ATH-TWX9MK3 better than R50i NC?
- Active noise cancellingYes · R50i NC: No
- Battery life15 h vs 10 h+50%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%
Why is R50i NC better than ATH-TWX9MK3?
R50i NC has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 11 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, LHDC, LC3, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.1 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9MK2vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK36.28.4
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds4 ProvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK38.48.4
vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-OhrhörervsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK3
vsBose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-EarbudsvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK3
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsSoundcore R50i NC
vsHuawei FreeClip 2vsSoundcore R50i NC