vs
8.9Battery9.6
4.6Build & features2.7
Why is ATH-TWX9MK3 better than earU ER-100PT?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · earU ER-100PT: No
- Battery life15 h vs 14 h+7%
- LDACYes · earU ER-100PT: No
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%
- Earbud weight (each)5.1 g vs 8 g+57%
Why is earU ER-100PT better than ATH-TWX9MK3?
- aptXNo · ATH-TWX9MK3: Yes
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 10 mm+72%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 1.5 h+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 107 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 15 h | 14 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 11 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, LHDC, LC3, AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.1 g | 8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9MK2vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK36.28.4
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds4 ProvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK38.48.4
vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-OhrhörervsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK3
vsSoundcore R50i NCvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK3
vsBose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-EarbudsvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK3
vs
Kenwood GLASS Core Pro KH-CRZ100TvsCasio earU ER-100PT8.07.8