vs
4.0Battery6.5
4.1Build & features5.4
Why is ATH-TWX9MK2 better than nearphones HA-NP1T2?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · nearphones HA-NP1T2: No
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- aptXYes · nearphones HA-NP1T2: No
Why is nearphones HA-NP1T2 better than ATH-TWX9MK2?
- Battery life6.5 h vs 9 h+38%
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 6+15%
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 10 mm+72%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
- Earbud weight (each)5.5 g vs 4.6 g+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6.5 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.5 g | 4.6 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Shokz OpenFit 2vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK26.66.2vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9MK2vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK36.28.4
vsHuawei FreeBuds Pro 4vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK26.86.2vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9MK2vsEdifier A6vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9MK2vsEdifier Comfo Flex
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsJVC nearphones HA-NP1T26.46.2