vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
3.8Battery8.9
4.2Build & features4.2
Why is ATH-TWX9MK2 better than TE-J2?
- aptXYes · TE-J2: No
Why is TE-J2 better than ATH-TWX9MK2?
- Battery life6.5 h vs 12 h+85%
- LDACNo · ATH-TWX9MK2: Yes
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 11 mm+90%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 1.5 h+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | — |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6.5 h | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Total with charging case | — | 52 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.5 g | 5.5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Shokz OpenFit 2vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK26.76.1
vsBeats Powerbeats FitvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK25.76.1
vsbeyerdynamic Amiron 200vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK25.56.1vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9MK2vsEdifier A6vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9MK2vsEdifier X3 Pro6.16.6vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX9MK2vsEdifier Comfo Flex