Why is ATH-TWX7 better than OpenFit?
- Active noise cancellingYes · OpenFit: No
- Battery life7.5 h vs 7 h+7%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 50 Hz5×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz2.5×
Why is OpenFit better than ATH-TWX7?
- Total with charging case24 h vs 28 h+17%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 16,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 8 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 96 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6.5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | 28 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 5 min → 1 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | Yes | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.7 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Colours | — | Black, Beige |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Sony WF-C700NvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX76.96.9
vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX75.56.9
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX7
vsHuawei FreeBuds Pro 3vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX76.76.9vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX7vsAVIOT TE-J1-AiNA6.96.4
vs
Huawei FreeClipvsShokz OpenFit4.84.6