Why is ATH-TWX7 better than ED-NBDS?
- Battery life7.5 h vs 6 h+25%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- LDACYes · ED-NBDS: No
- Earbud weight (each)4.7 g vs 6 g+28%
Why is ED-NBDS better than ATH-TWX7?
- aptXNo · ATH-TWX7: Yes
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 10 mm+72%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Hybrid |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 24 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 92 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | 6 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6.5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, aptX, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.7 g | 6 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Sony WF-C700NvsAudio Technica ATH-TWX76.96.8
vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX75.46.8
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds FE SM-R400vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX7
vsHuawei FreeBuds Pro 3vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX76.76.8vs
Audio Technica ATH-TWX7vsAVIOT TE-J1-AiNA6.86.3
vs
Beats Fit ProvsEdifier ED-NBDS6.16.1