vs
7.2Noise control & calls9.3
Why is ATH-SQ1TW2NC better than Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds better than ATH-SQ1TW2NC?
Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7.5 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Colours | — | White |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Soundcore Liberty BudsvsAudio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NC8.28.2
vs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsBaseus Bowie MC2
vs
Audio Technica ATH-SQ1TW2NCvsSoundcore R50i NC
vs
Huawei FreeClip 2vsBose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds
vs
Apple AirPods 5vsBose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds
vs
Huawei FreeBuds Pro 5vsBose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds
