vs
4.2Battery3.2
4.6Build & features8.2
Why is ATH-SQ1TW better than Buds 3T Pro?
- Battery life6.5 h vs 6 h+8%
Why is Buds 3T Pro better than ATH-SQ1TW?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · ATH-SQ1TW: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 10 mm+72%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
- Earbud weight (each)5.2 g vs 4.9 g+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6.5 h | 6 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 24 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | LHDC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.2 g | 4.9 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
