vs
6.3Battery2.8
Why is ATH-S220BT better than TAH5205WT/00?
- Battery life60 h vs 29 h2.1×
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
- Weight180 g vs 210 g+17%
- Highest frequency32,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+60%
Why is TAH5205WT/00 better than ATH-S220BT?
- Charging time4 h vs 3.5 h+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 32,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | 90 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 60 h | 29 h |
| Charging time | 4 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 210 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Colours | — | White |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
