How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-CKS50TW vs EPIC LAB

Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TW vs JLab EPIC LAB

What ATH-CKS50TW does better (3) and where EPIC LAB wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TW
Audio Technica · 2022ATH-CKS50TW
6.4Score
3 advantages≈ $220
vs
JLab EPIC LAB
JLab · 2024EPIC LAB
9.1Score
7 advantages≈ $220
Higher score
6.2Sound6.8
4.8Noise control & calls7.2
8.9Battery8.5
2.7Build & features8.0

Why is ATH-CKS50TW better than EPIC LAB?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 13 h+54%
  2. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  3. aptXYes · EPIC LAB: No

Why is EPIC LAB better than ATH-CKS50TW?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · ATH-CKS50TW: Yes
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  4. LDACNo · ATH-CKS50TW: Yes
  5. Earbud weight (each)8 g vs 5.3 g+51%
  6. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
  7. Driver size9 mm vs 10 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

JLab EPIC LABJLab EPIC LAB≈ $2209.1
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicHybrid
Driver size9 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance20 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity110 dB98 dB
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h13 h
Total with charging case50 h—
Charging time3 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBCLDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXYesNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)8 g5.3 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare