vs
4.6Noise control & calls9.3
2.6Build & features7.2
Why is ATH-CKS50TW better than Svanar wireless?
- Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
- aptXYes · Svanar wireless: No
Why is Svanar wireless better than ATH-CKS50TW?
- Active noise cancellingNo · ATH-CKS50TW: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- LDACNo · ATH-CKS50TW: Yes
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 35,000 Hz+75%
- Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 9 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 5 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 35,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 50 h | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 8 g | 8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Colours | — | Silver |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Denon PerL ProvsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW6.46.4
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro SM-R510vsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW6.56.4
vsJabra Elite 4 ActivevsAudio Technica ATH-CKS50TW6.76.4vs
Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TWvsEarFun Free 2Svs
Audio Technica ATH-CKS50TWvsEarFun Air S6.46.4
vs
Jabra Evolve2 BudsvsHifiMan Svanar wireless8.88.7