How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ATH-CKS330XBT vs HA-FX28W

Audio Technica ATH-CKS330XBT vs JVC HA-FX28W

What ATH-CKS330XBT does better (4) and where HA-FX28W wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Audio Technica ATH-CKS330XBT
Audio Technica · 2020ATH-CKS330XBT
5.4Score
4 advantages≈ $25
Higher score
vs
JVC HA-FX28W
JVC · 2020HA-FX28W
3.6Score
2 advantages≈ $19
9.0Battery2.1
3.0Build & features3.6

Why is ATH-CKS330XBT better than HA-FX28W?

  1. Battery life20 h vs 6.5 h3.1×
  2. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  3. Highest frequency30,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+50%
  4. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is HA-FX28W better than ATH-CKS330XBT?

  1. Weight24 g vs 13 g+85%
  2. Driver size5.8 mm vs 8.6 mm+48%
Specifications

Side by side

JVC HA-FX28WJVC HA-FX28W≈ $193.6
Sound
FitNeckbandIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size5.8 mm8.6 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency30,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity98 dB—
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h6.5 h
Charging time2 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Weight24 g13 g
Protection ratingIPX2IPX2
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2IPx2
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare