vs
3.1Battery3.9
Why is ATH-ANC300TW better than Ne EXTRA HP-NX500BT?
ATH-ANC300TW has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Ne EXTRA HP-NX500BT better than ATH-ANC300TW?
- Battery life4.5 h vs 5.5 h+22%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx42×
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
- Highest frequency25,000 Hz vs 45,000 Hz+80%
- Driver size5.8 mm vs 9.8 mm+69%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 5.8 mm | 9.8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 25,000 Hz | 45,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 14 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 106 dB | 114 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4.5 h | 5.5 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX2 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx2 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
