vs
8.9Sound9.2
9.2Noise control & calls6.4
7.9Battery7.5
Why is ATH-AL5NC better than Aventho 200?
- Battery life75 h vs 63 h+19%
- Battery life with ANC50 h vs 40 h+25%
- Weight240 g vs 293 g+22%
- LDACYes · Aventho 200: No
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+82%
- Driver size53 mm vs 45 mm+18%
Why is Aventho 200 better than ATH-AL5NC?
- Charging time3.5 h vs 1.5 h2.3×
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
- aptXNo · ATH-AL5NC: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 53 mm | 45 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 22,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 52 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 75 h | 63 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 50 h | 40 h |
| Charging time | 3.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 240 g | 293 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
