How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. AirPods (3rd Gen) vs WOOD HA-FW1000T

Apple AirPods (3rd Gen) vs JVC WOOD HA-FW1000T

What AirPods (3rd Gen) does better (1) and where WOOD HA-FW1000T wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Apple AirPods (3rd Gen)
Apple · 2021AirPods (3rd Gen)
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $110
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000T
JVC · 2021WOOD HA-FW1000T
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
3.4Battery6.1
5.9Build & features2.8

Why is AirPods (3rd Gen) better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?

  1. Earbud weight (each)4.3 g vs 7.8 g+82%

Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than AirPods (3rd Gen)?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 9 h+50%
  2. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitSemi-in-ear (open)In-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—11 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—48,000 Hz
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h9 h
Charging time—2.5 h
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.2
Bluetooth codecs—aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—No
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.3 g7.8 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare