How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. HydraBlast vs ES300

Altec Lansing HydraBlast vs Edifier ES300

What HydraBlast does better (0) and where ES300 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Altec Lansing HydraBlast
Altec Lansing · 2025HydraBlast
0 advantages≈ $160
vs
Edifier ES300
Edifier · 2025ES300
2 advantages

Why is HydraBlast better than ES300?

HydraBlast has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is ES300 better than HydraBlast?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · HydraBlast: Yes
  2. LDACNo · HydraBlast: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
Output power—45 W
Lowest frequency—56 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Battery & charging
Battery life20 h—
Charging time4 h—
Mains poweredNo—
Battery powered (portable)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecsSBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Design & build
Weight—3,700 g
Width203 mm—
Height89 mm—
Depth89 mm—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
Light effectsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare