vs
9.2Noise control & calls7.8
4.9Battery3.9
Why is TMA-2 Studio Wireless better than WH-1000XM6?
- Weight227 g vs 254 g+12%
- Driver size40 mm vs 30 mm+33%
- Charging time3 h vs 3.5 h+17%
Why is WH-1000XM6 better than TMA-2 Studio Wireless?
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 4 Hz2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 4 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 111 dB | 103 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 40 h | 40 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 30 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 227 g | 254 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio Wireless7.57.5vs
Aiaiai TMA-2 Studio WirelessvsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Goldvs
Aiaiai TMA-2 Studio WirelessvsAudio Technica ATH-R70xa
vsFiiO FT13vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio Wireless
vsSony WH-1000XM6vsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/GoldvsSony WH-1000XM6vsAudio Technica ATH-R70xa