vs
9.2Noise control & calls9.2
4.9Battery7.9
Why is TMA-2 Studio Wireless better than ATH-AL5NC?
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- Weight227 g vs 240 g+6%
- Charging time3 h vs 3.5 h+17%
Why is ATH-AL5NC better than TMA-2 Studio Wireless?
- Battery life40 h vs 75 h+88%
- Driver size40 mm vs 53 mm+32%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 53 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 52 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 111 dB | 103 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 40 h | 75 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 50 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 227 g | 240 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio Wireless7.57.5vs
Aiaiai TMA-2 Studio WirelessvsMeze 99 Classics 2nd Gen Walnut/Goldvs
Aiaiai TMA-2 Studio WirelessvsAudio Technica ATH-R70xa
vsFiiO FT13vsAiaiai TMA-2 Studio Wireless
vs
Sennheiser HD 480 ProvsAudio Technica ATH-AL5NCvs
Audio Technica ATH-AL5NCvsV-MODA M-100 PRO