vs
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
2.8Battery2.1
Why is TRENCHTOWN ANC better than RHOX LX?
- Battery life6 h vs 3 h2×
- Total with charging case24 h vs 10 h2.4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
Why is RHOX LX better than TRENCHTOWN ANC?
RHOX LX has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 14 Ω |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 3 h |
| Total with charging case | 24 h | 10 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 30 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
