8.3Sound8.6
Why is A65K better than Poseidon M100?
A65K has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Poseidon M100 better than A65K?
- Channel count3.1 vs 7.12.3×
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 460 W | — |
| Speaker channels | 3.1.2 | 7.1 |
| Channel count | 3.1 | 7.1 |
| Subwoofer | Wireless subwoofer included | Wireless subwoofer included |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
| DTS:X | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Stereo | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Mains powered | Yes | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| HDMI eARC / ARC | Yes | — |
| Optical input | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Multiroom | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 1,150 g | — |
| Width | 880 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
TCL A65KvsBose TV-Lautsprecher (2nd Gen)
vsSamsung HW-Q600H/XUvsTCL A65Kvs
TCL A65KvsSamsung Q800H 5.1.2-Kanal Dolby Atmos Soundbar
vsJBL Bar 800MK2 7.1-Kanal-SoundbarvsTCL A65Kvs
TCL A65KvsJBL Bar 300 MK2 5.0-Kanal-Soundbar, Dolby Atmos, MultiBeam 3.0
vs
ULTIMEA Poseidon M100vsLoewe soundbar antares 80W Stereo, Air Motion Membranen