Why is H3 better than RHOX LX?
- Battery life5 h vs 3 h+67%
- Total with charging case20 h vs 10 h2×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · RHOX LX: No
- aptXYes · RHOX LX: No
- Driver size8.6 mm vs 8 mm+7%
Why is RHOX LX better than H3?
RHOX LX has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 8.6 mm | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 14 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 3 h |
| Total with charging case | 20 h | 10 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 30 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Gold | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |






