vs
3.3Battery3.9
6.2Build & features3.1
Why is LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC better than EAH-AZ80?
- Charging time1.5 h vs 7 h4.7×
- Earbud weight (each)4.1 g vs 7 g+71%
- Driver size12 mm vs 10 mm+20%
Why is EAH-AZ80 better than LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC?
- Battery life5.5 h vs 7 h+27%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC: Yes
- LDACNo · LinkBuds UC for Microsoft Teams WF-L900UC: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 12 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5.5 h | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 25 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 7 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.1 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
