Why is IER-M500 better than AQUA LIGHT?
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
Why is AQUA LIGHT better than IER-M500?
AQUA LIGHT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Bone conduction |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 5 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 9 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB | 117 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 10 h |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 7 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
