vs
4.4Battery6.0
3.3Build & features5.0
Why is Float Run WI-OE610 better than Sonic?
Float Run WI-OE610 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Sonic better than Float Run WI-OE610?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Float Run WI-OE610: Yes
- Charging time3 h vs 1 h3×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- aptXNo · Float Run WI-OE610: Yes
- Weight33 g vs 31 g+6%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | Bone conduction |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 16 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 6 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 117 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 10 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | 1 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 33 g | 31 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
