How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Slyr Pro Wireless vs ULT Wear

Skullcandy Slyr Pro Wireless vs Sony ULT Wear

What Slyr Pro Wireless does better (1) and where ULT Wear wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Skullcandy Slyr Pro Wireless
Skullcandy · 2024Slyr Pro Wireless
1 advantage≈ $125
vs
Sony ULT Wear
Sony · 2024ULT Wear
6.3Score
3 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
3.2Battery4.7

Why is Slyr Pro Wireless better than ULT Wear?

  1. Driver size50 mm vs 40 mm+25%

Why is ULT Wear better than Slyr Pro Wireless?

  1. Battery life24 h vs 50 h2.1×
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
  3. Weight274 g vs 255 g+7%
Specifications

Side by side

Sony ULT WearSony ULT Wear≈ $956.3
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size50 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity95 dB110 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life24 h50 h
Battery life with ANC—30 h
Charging time—3.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight274 g255 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursPlayStation, Xbox®—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare