How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Sesh ANC Active S2SAW-S749 vs Buds 5

Skullcandy Sesh ANC Active S2SAW-S749 vs Xiaomi Buds 5

What Sesh ANC Active S2SAW-S749 does better (3) and where Buds 5 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Skullcandy Sesh ANC Active S2SAW-S749
Skullcandy · 2024Sesh ANC Active S2SAW-S749
9.5Score
3 advantages≈ $85
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Buds 5
Xiaomi · 2024Buds 5
9.4Score
1 advantage≈ $70
7.2Noise control & calls9.3
8.8Battery8.4

Why is Sesh ANC Active S2SAW-S749 better than Buds 5?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 10 h+20%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
  3. Dust protection (IP)6 vs 5+20%

Why is Buds 5 better than Sesh ANC Active S2SAW-S749?

  1. Driver size12 mm vs 12.4 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Buds 5Xiaomi Buds 5≈ $709.4
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size12 mm12.4 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity99 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h10 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case—40 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Weight56 g—
Protection ratingIP67IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Dust protection (IP)65
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare