How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Push ANC Active vs Buds 5

Skullcandy Push ANC Active vs Xiaomi Buds 5

What Push ANC Active does better (4) and where Buds 5 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Skullcandy Push ANC Active
Skullcandy · 2024Push ANC Active
9.0Score
4 advantages≈ $75
vs
Xiaomi Buds 5
Xiaomi · 2024Buds 5
9.4Score
1 advantage≈ $70
Higher score
5.7Noise control & calls9.3
8.6Battery8.4

Why is Push ANC Active better than Buds 5?

  1. Battery life12 h vs 10 h+20%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
  3. Total with charging case58 h vs 40 h+45%
  4. Dust protection (IP)6 vs 5+20%

Why is Buds 5 better than Push ANC Active?

  1. Driver size12 mm vs 12.4 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Xiaomi Buds 5Xiaomi Buds 5≈ $709.4
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm12.4 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity99 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h10 h
Battery life with ANC7 h—
Total with charging case58 h40 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Protection ratingIP67IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Dust protection (IP)65
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare