How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Method 360 ANC vs WF-C710N

Skullcandy Method 360 ANC vs Sony WF-C710N

What Method 360 ANC does better (3) and where WF-C710N wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Skullcandy Method 360 ANC
Skullcandy · 2025Method 360 ANC
6.7Score
3 advantages≈ $100
vs
Sony WF-C710N
Sony · 2025WF-C710N
7.0Score
2 advantages≈ $80
Higher score
5.6Noise control & calls7.2
8.1Battery6.9
2.2Build & features4.6

Why is Method 360 ANC better than WF-C710N?

  1. Battery life with ANC32 h vs 8 h4×
  2. Total with charging case40 h vs 22 h+86%
  3. Driver size12 mm vs 5 mm2.4×

Why is WF-C710N better than Method 360 ANC?

  1. Battery life9 h vs 12 h+33%
  2. Earbud weight (each)11 g vs 5.2 g2.1×
Specifications

Side by side

Sony WF-C710NSony WF-C710N≈ $807.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size12 mm5 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity97 dB—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life9 h12 h
Battery life with ANC32 h8 h
Total with charging case40 h22 h
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 2 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)11 g5.2 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
ColoursCrazy Pink, Cement, Primer, Bone, Plasma, Future, True Black, Leopard—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare