How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. ICON ANC vs ULT Wear

Skullcandy ICON ANC vs Sony ULT Wear

What ICON ANC does better (3) and where ULT Wear wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Skullcandy ICON ANC
Skullcandy · 2025ICON ANC
8.0Score
3 advantages≈ $85
Higher score
vs
Sony ULT Wear
Sony · 2024ULT Wear
6.3Score
1 advantage≈ $95
7.8Noise control & calls7.8
7.4Battery4.7

Why is ICON ANC better than ULT Wear?

  1. Battery life60 h vs 50 h+20%
  2. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 30 h+67%
  3. Weight225 g vs 255 g+13%

Why is ULT Wear better than ICON ANC?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
Specifications

Side by side

Sony ULT WearSony ULT Wear≈ $956.3
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity98 dB110 dB
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life60 h50 h
Battery life with ANC50 h30 h
Charging time—3.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight225 g255 g
Protection ratingIPX4—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4—
FoldableYesYes
ColoursTrue Black, Bone/Orange, Realtree APX Black/Orange, Primer—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare