How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Crusher 1080 ANC vs WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration

Skullcandy Crusher 1080 ANC vs Sony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration

What Crusher 1080 ANC does better (2) and where WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Skullcandy Crusher 1080 ANC
Skullcandy · 2026Crusher 1080 ANC
8.0Score
2 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Sony WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration
5.3Score
5 advantages≈ $270
7.8Noise control & calls6.2
7.4Battery3.7

Why is Crusher 1080 ANC better than WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration?

  1. Battery life60 h vs 34 h+76%
  2. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 27 h+85%

Why is WH-1000XM4C Apache 207 Collaboration better than Crusher 1080 ANC?

  1. Weight374 g vs 253 g+48%
  2. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 4 Hz5×
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  4. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
  5. Driver size36 mm vs 40 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size36 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz4 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance36 Ω—
Sensitivity122 dB106 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—5
Battery & charging
Battery life60 h34 h
Battery life with ANC50 h27 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4 h—
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.36
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE AudioYes—
AuracastYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight374 g253 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursPrimer, Candy, Cement, True Black—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare