vs
7.8Noise control & calls7.8
2.7Battery5.6
Why is AONIC 50 SBH2350 better than WH-XB910N?
- aptXYes · WH-XB910N: No
- Charging time2.5 h vs 3.5 h+40%
- Driver size50 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Why is WH-XB910N better than AONIC 50 SBH2350?
- Battery life20 h vs 50 h2.5×
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
- Weight334 g vs 252 g+33%
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 25,000 Hz+14%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 50 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 7 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 25,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 39 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 98 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | 50 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 3.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 334 g | 252 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
